COASE.

MIES standard web organises the contents of a professional deliverable around the engagement and its recipient. Select the relevant conditions to obtain an outline with section purposes, information requirements, practical checks and reference notes.

Twelve deliverables in nine families: valuation for capital transactions, treasury, restructuring, business plan, lender dossier, planning and budget, organisational arrangements, due diligence, valuation for financial reporting, purchase price allocation, projects and facilities, and generational transition. 12 deliverables · 9 generators · 486 content blocks · 454 coverage requirements.

A configurable outline preview and an editable Word document. Calculations, Excel models and completed reports are not generated by this web version.

Use the outline as a professional reference. Source notes and limits remain attached to the selected contents; the output is not a certification of completeness or compliance. The interface and outlines are currently in Italian.

The standard web tool can be opened below. Word export loads its document library from jsDelivr; if it is unavailable, the outline preview remains usable.

MIES provides the structure of the engagement within the COASE suite. Using other suite tools is optional; no automatic data transfer or report assembly between products is implemented here. The downloadable AI Knowledge Layer is a separate release candidate undergoing pilot testing.

References, editions, classifications and limits follow the selected family. Consult the notes in the generated outline; do not treat a reference as proof of current applicability.

A worked example becomes useful when its data, calculations and presentation can be followed together. PROUVE packages them as a single reference: the starting dataset, a functioning Excel model, the resulting exhibits and the report passages that interpret them. Each package records the assumptions, expected results and changes required to adapt the case. Complete deliverables illustrate scope and depth; individual modules support a specific calculation in an existing workbook. The corpus shares the structure and conventions of MIES and includes examples, calculation components and complete engagement packages.

Reusable reports, Excel models and calculation modules for M&A, valuation, financial modelling, FP&A, restructuring, project finance, transaction support, LBO, financing and debt advisory. Examples document a defined case; their methods, assumptions and conclusions require adaptation to the engagement.

Starting a model, extending an existing workbook, preparing client exhibits, setting the depth of a report, examining an unfamiliar calculation, comparing methodological treatments, training and maintaining an internal reference library.

• Complete packages — dataset, model, exhibits and report supplied together, with consistent assumptions and a traceable progression from inputs to presentation
• Worked reports — populated deliverables with analysis, methodological disclosures, limitations and caveats, available as complete documents or selected sections
• Complete models — editable Excel files with live formulas, documented assumptions and a consistent separation of inputs, calculations and outputs
• Calculation modules — self-contained blocks with defined inputs, outputs and dependencies, usable independently of the parent model
• Specific analyses — packages cover normalised EBITDA, target working capital, enterprise-to-equity bridges, debt service, liquidity in distress and other engagement calculations
• Case variants — alternative cases address valuation with incomplete information, non-recurring items, liquidity stress and conflicting conventions; methodological choices and their consequences are explained
• Expected results — reference inputs and expected outputs accompany model checks, allowing the supplied example to be reproduced before adaptation
• Adaptation instructions — concise guidance identifies which data to replace, assumptions to revisit, sections to amend and results to review
• Input conventions — units, currencies, signs, periods and classifications stated explicitly; input fields distinguish case data from user assumptions
• External integration — modules fit into third-party workbooks through documented input and output links, with convention checks and integration notes
• Visible logic — formulas remain accessible; parameters are held in designated inputs, with no hidden calculation macros or hard-coded assumptions inside formulas
• Client presentation — editable tables, charts and report passages for adaptation to the engagement and house style, retaining their connection to the underlying analysis
• Technical documentation — specification, glossary, source register, usage conditions and known limitations accompany each model and module
• Version and verification record — release identifier, changes, verification date, checks performed and unresolved limitations recorded for each published component
• Selection — search by engagement family, situation, analytical question or calculation, with the required inputs and package contents visible before selection
• Reuse rights — the licence permits adaptation and incorporation into client deliverables and states the conditions governing distribution and further reuse

Example datasets. Report files. Excel models and independent modules. Exhibits. Adaptation instructions. Technical specifications. Version and verification records.

PROUVE and MIES are offered together and share a methodological corpus, with independent access to worked packages and modules. Components support TANGE, NERVI and BOOLE. AALTO supplies historical accounts, PIANO reviews external models and LOOS applies the selected reporting register to adapted deliverables.

On request.

A valuation reflects choices about earnings, cash conversion, risk and the rights being valued. TANGE records those choices and computes their effect. Financial normalisations, forecast assumptions, comparables and discount rates form a documented calculation chain, from the source data to enterprise and equity value. Methods, scenarios and successive valuations are compared on a consistent basis. Changes in value are attributed to their underlying assumptions; an observed price is translated into the performance it implies. The professional selects the methods, resolves the disputed assumptions and determines the conclusion.

Enterprise and equity valuation of listed and unlisted going concerns, standalone entities, groups and controlling or minority interests. Dedicated IAS 36 impairment schedules.

Acquisition and disposal pricing. Shareholder transactions. Fairness and expert opinions. Impairment testing. Restructuring. Litigation support. Third-party valuation review. Negotiation preparation.

• Configuration — valuation date, purpose, basis of value, interest, currency and methods; missing inputs and methodological choices recorded before calculation
• Financial base — itemised earnings and cash-flow normalisations; reported-to-adjusted reconciliation; maintenance investment, working capital and tax-loss schedules
• Methods — unlevered DCF (FCFF/WACC), levered DCF (FCFE/Ke), APV, economic profit and sum-of-the-parts; results reconciled and method selection documented
• Comparables — trading and transaction multiples from user-supplied or provider datasets; documented screening, exclusions, calendarisation, LTM/NTM alignment, outliers and regression-based value maps
• Horizon — two- and three-stage projections, fade to steady state, mid-year convention, stub periods and valuation-date adjustments
• Terminal value — Gordon growth, value-driver formula and exit-multiple cross-check; implied growth, implied multiple and terminal-value contribution disclosed
• Cost of capital — risk-free rate, equity risk premium, peer beta, relevering method, size and country premia, specific risk, cost of debt and target capital structure; each input sourced
• Consistency — nominal/real, currency and inflation checks; consistent lease treatment across earnings, cash flows, debt and discount rates
• Equity bridge — net debt, debt-like items, leases, pension obligations, minorities, associates, surplus assets and tax assets reconciled to equity value
• Equity interests — options, warrants and convertibles; dilution schedules; separately documented control, minority, marketability and holding-company adjustments
• Sensitivity — discount-rate, growth and multiple matrices; operating-driver sensitivities, tornado analysis and explicitly weighted scenarios
• Price-implied assumptions — reverse valuation solves for growth, margin, returns or discount rates consistent with a specified price, within stated bounds
• Value attribution — methods, scenarios, prior versions and supplied third-party valuations compared; differences attributed to operating assumptions, timing, discount rates, terminal value and bridge items under a disclosed calculation order
• Impairment — CGU valuation schedules, carrying-value comparison, headroom and sensitivity; pre-tax rate derivation for the applicable IAS 36 calculation
• Evidence — sources, dates, rationale and overrides retained for each parameter; previous valuations and decision history preserved when inputs are refreshed; live formulas support independent recomputation
• Challenge pack — disputed assumptions, missing evidence and methodological questions linked to the affected calculations; response notes retain their supporting references

Excel model with live formulas. Valuation report. Methodology notes. Football field. Equity bridge. Value-attribution tables. Price-implied assumptions. Source and assumption registers. Challenge pack.

Optional links: historical accounts from AALTO; forecasts from NERVI; debt schedules from BOOLE. Report structure from MIES, components from PROUVE and terminology from LOOS. ANDO prepares confidential material for external drafting.

On request.

NERVI builds an integrated plan around the decisions that change a business. Historical accounts establish the opening position; selected drivers determine revenue, costs, investment and cash conversion. Detail follows the business and the materiality of each item. Drivers and dated decisions remain editable during discussions with the client, with P&L, balance sheet and cash-flow effects updating together. Actuals replace forecast periods while preserving the approved plan. Funding shortfalls remain visible, and target calculations show the changes required to reach a specified cash or leverage outcome.

Integrated, driver-based planning for operating companies and groups through expansion, maturity, decline and distress. Management, lender and valuation views, with operating detail selected for the decisions under review.

Business plans. Budgets and rolling forecasts. Financing applications. Vendor plans and buyer cases. Independent business reviews. Turnaround plans. Forward-looking monitoring. Impairment and valuation projections.

• Intake — accounts, trial balances and existing Excel plans; period mapping, reclassification, normalisations, opening-balance reconciliation and visible data gaps
• Adjustable detail — aggregate revenue or price × volume; personnel by function or department; working capital using days-based assumptions, in aggregate or by category. Projection techniques follow the business profile and user selection
• Baseline — integrated P&L, balance sheet and cash flow from opening balances and explicit drivers; historical relationships proposed as assumptions for user confirmation
• Revenue — price, volume, mix, backlog, pipeline conversion, cohorts and seasonality; projection by selected product, customer, business line or geography
• Operating costs — fixed-variable split, activity-linked costs, unit consumption, purchase prices, inflation and efficiency; contribution margins and functional allocations
• Personnel — FTE and unit cost by function or department; departmental movements, recruitment dates, pay changes and associated cash timing
• Working capital — receivable, payable and inventory days linked to relevant activity bases; seasonality, tax balances, factoring and collection assumptions
• Investment — maintenance and expansion capex, payment timing, depreciation by vintage, existing assets and leases; separate current and new commitments
• Tax — current and deferred tax, losses carried forward and interest-deductibility limits under the selected jurisdictional parameters
• Funding — debt schedules, committed facility limits, revolver use, cash sweeps, dividends and equity injections; covenant definitions and testing dates retained
• Dated decisions — hiring, investment, new customers, closures and other operating changes entered with effective dates, ramp-up and recurring or one-off effects; differences from baseline attributed to each decision
• Scenarios — alternative driver sets and timing; EBITDA, cash, leverage, DSCR and valuation sensitivities; break-even, covenant-breach and reverse-stress analysis
• Target solving — required price, margin, cost, collection or investment changes calculated against cash or leverage targets and stated bounds; infeasible or non-unique solutions identified
• Actuals and reforecast — actual-versus-plan variances, retained plan versions and rolling forecasts; operating and timing effects separated; forward DSCR recalculated
• Distress — 13-week receipts-and-payments forecast linked to opening cash; liquidity bridge, standstill assumptions and dated restructuring measures
• Integrity — balance, cash and period reconciliations; explicit dependencies and assumption records; unfunded deficits and exceeded facility limits reported without balancing entries

Three-statement model. Operating schedules. 13-week cash forecast. KPI and covenant tables. Scenario and target analyses. Decision register. Funding-gap schedule. Plan exhibits. Excel with live formulas.

Optional links: actuals from AALTO; debt from BOOLE; valuation in TANGE. Planning structures from MIES, calculation components from PROUVE and narrative terminology from LOOS. External Excel inputs remain available for each calculation area.

On request.

BOOLE translates financing terms into dated principal, interest, fee and accounting schedules. Contract terms are extracted into a proposed configuration; the user checks each clause against its source before it is applied in the calculation. Drawdowns, payments and amendments update the facility record by effective date, preserving the terms previously applied. Offers are compared using the same funding requirement, currency and horizon. Existing schedules are reconciled against the configured terms, with differences assigned to periods and calculation mechanics. Portfolio views bring debt service, refinancing needs and covenant headroom together, using operating forecasts supplied by the professional.

Corporate and structured-finance debt, including bank facilities, bonds, mezzanine, shareholder financing and leasing; euro and multi-currency. Contractual definitions and accounting treatment are confirmed by the professional.

Financing negotiation. Offer comparison. Refinancing and amend-and-extend. Debt monitoring. Restructuring. Amortised-cost accounting. Covenant reporting. Business-plan, LBO and project-finance schedules. Independent reconciliation of bank schedules.

• Instruments — term loans, revolving facilities, capex and acquisition lines, bridges, bonds, minibonds, mezzanine, PIK and shareholder loans, leasing
• Clause extraction — terms proposed from source passages; user confirmation, correction and missing-clause review precede configuration; unresolved interpretation remains flagged
• Configuration — clause parameters, facility templates and explicit interaction order; each calculated amount retains the terms and source references applied
• Repayment — constant instalment, constant principal, bullet, balloon, custom and CFADS- or DSCR-sculpted profiles; availability, grace and pre-amortisation periods
• Rate mechanics — fixed and floating rates; Euribor, compounded €STR and SOFR; lookback, observation shift, index or all-in floors, ratchets, step changes and default interest
• Conventions — day counts, fixing dates, business-day adjustment, calendars, accrual treatment, short and long stubs and rounding rules
• Options and fees — voluntary and mandatory prepayment, break costs, make-whole, cash sweep, extension and capitalisation; upfront, commitment, arrangement and agency fees
• Rates and hedging — historical fixings, forward curves and user scenarios; parallel and non-parallel shifts; IRS, cap and collar overlays and hedged debt service
• Actuals and forecast — dated drawdowns and payments reconciled to scheduled amounts; variances retained; revised balances feed subsequent accruals and forecast payments
• Amendments — changes applied from their effective dates; original and amended terms, consent fees and affected schedules retained for comparison
• Accounting — amortised cost, EIR, transaction costs, accruals and maturity classification; modification/extinguishment calculations with user-confirmed accounting treatment
• Covenants — contract-specific DSCR, LLCR, ICR, leverage and gearing definitions; testing dates, headroom, waivers and forecast breaches
• Portfolio — consolidated debt service, maturity ladder, available facilities, fixed-floating mix, IRR, all-in cost, weighted average life and duration
• Offer comparison — equivalent funding amounts, draw dates, currency, horizon and common rate assumptions; fees and repayment differences included; lifetime costs compared and refinancing break-even calculated
• Restructuring — moratoria, maturity extensions, revised amortisation, prepayments, refinancing and new financing; effects on debt service, balances and covenants compared
• Reconciliation — imported bank schedules compared with recomputed amounts; differences itemised by period, payment date, fixing, day count, fee, clause and rounding; calculation history retained

Facility and portfolio schedules. Offer and restructuring comparisons. Reconciliation of bank schedules. Covenant headroom. Amortised-cost schedules. Clause and amendment registers. Excel with live formulas. API.

Optional links: debt service and balances into NERVI; net debt and FCFE schedules into TANGE. Financing structures from MIES and components from PROUVE. Operating forecasts also enter directly from external Excel models.

On request.

A financial history must be consistent enough to analyse and detailed enough to trace. AALTO prepares that history from filed accounts and accounting extracts, retaining the source behind each figure. Original data, reclassification rules and analyst adjustments remain distinct. The same approved mappings apply across successive periods, while new or ambiguous items enter a review queue. Financial statements, trial balances and supporting note tables are reconciled before the historical base passes into valuation, planning or reporting. Missing information remains identifiable in the output.

Preparation of historical financial statements and management reclassifications for companies and groups. Combines statutory accounts, accounting extracts and supplied supporting detail within an explicit reporting perimeter. Accounting-framework differences and information gaps remain visible.

Historical base for valuation and planning. Due diligence data preparation. Credit and counterparty analysis. Peer comparison. Portfolio monitoring. Multi-year and multi-entity analysis. Recurring updates of client accounts.

• Intake — XBRL/iXBRL facts, Excel and CSV trial balances and accounting extracts; assisted PDF and note-table extraction. Units and signs harmonised under recorded rules, with original figures retained
• Source register — records entity, reporting period, document version, currency, unit and perimeter. Each imported amount retains its source location and the transformations applied to it
• Statutory reconstruction — rebuilds the source statements before management reclassification, retaining reported line items, totals and the evidence required to investigate differences
• XBRL context — checks QNames, contexts, dimensions, units and taxonomy versions. Separate, consolidated, comparative and restated facts are identified before a reporting series is assembled
• Mapping — applies approved rules from source items to statutory and management lines. Proposed mappings remain outside the calculation chain until accepted by the user
• Review queue — unmapped items, ambiguous matches, conflicting classifications, reconciliation gaps and missing information grouped for review, with source amounts, proposed treatment and effects on the statements
• Reclassification — produces standard financial and management views from the same source base. Alternative presentations retain their contribution detail and explicit classification rules
• Adjustments — keeps analyst adjustments separate from imported figures and mappings. Each adjustment records its amount, rationale, affected periods and effect on reported and adjusted statements
• Period and entity alignment — builds multi-year and multi-entity series with checks for reporting dates, units, restatements and perimeter changes. Differences affecting comparability remain attached to the affected figures
• Framework differences — records recognition, measurement and presentation differences identified during review. Cross-framework reclassification retains these differences and any separately approved accounting adjustments
• Reconciliation — checks source totals, statement relationships, trial-balance ties and mapped contributions. Differences remain visible by source, period and output line
• Information coverage — distinguishes between reported zero values, missing information and undetermined amounts. Unsupported management detail remains unavailable; the output identifies the additional information required
• Mapping reuse — versions approved mappings by client and source structure. Subsequent imports reuse those rules and isolate new items and changed classifications for review
• Quality assessment — assesses source validity, reconciliation and analytical detail separately. Configured scores accompany the underlying checks, exceptions and coverage limitations
• Single calculation base — Excel and API outputs derive from the same approved data and rules. Each reclassified figure can be traced to its source contributions and adjustments

Source and reclassified statements. Multi-year financial history. Contribution and adjustment detail. Mapping register. Reconciliation and information-coverage report. Excel. API.

Works independently on external financial statements and accounting data. Supplies historical accounts to NERVI and TANGE, and source exhibits to MIES. Reclassification components shared with PROUVE. ANDO prepares confidential material where external processing is used.

On request.

Review starts with understanding how a model's calculations support the decisions for which it is used. PIANO reconstructs the workbook's architecture, traces selected results to their inputs and groups related findings around their underlying cause. The reviewer can distinguish demonstrated errors from items requiring judgement, then record the evidence and resolution. Financial tests apply to blocks confirmed by the user. Where supported, controlled recalculation measures how input changes or proposed corrections affect outputs.

Structural and financial calculation review of inherited and internally developed Excel models. Tests are based on the declared coverage and definitions confirmed by the user. Assumptions, accounting judgements and valuation conclusions remain matters for professional review.

Taking over an inherited model. Due diligence. Pre-delivery review. Independent checks of advisor and lender models. Model handover. Repair-versus-rebuild assessment. Version review. Verification of corrections.

• Architecture — maps sheets, calculation blocks and identified input, calculation and output roles. The reviewer confirms the model structure and the outputs within the review perimeter
• Dependencies — traces precedents and dependents across cells, ranges, sheets and linked files. Interactive views isolate the paths relevant to a selected result or finding
• Output exposure — connects findings to selected outputs, including cash, debt, covenants, value and returns. Static analysis shows downstream reach and the calculation paths involved
• Formula patterns — inventories distinct formulas, repeated logic, inconsistent sequences, volatile functions and complex constructions. Isolated constants and candidate formula overrides are presented in context
• Integrity — checks broken references, incomplete ranges, error propagation, circularity and calculation settings. Repeated symptoms are linked to their identified source where the dependency structure permits
• Workbook surface — inspects defined names, hidden content, protection, external links and data connections. Missing sources and refresh dependencies are included in the coverage record
• Grouped findings — combines related observations into review items. Priority reflects output criticality, dependency reach, recurrence and available evidence, with materiality settings controlled by the reviewer
• Finding classification — separates demonstrated errors from review candidates and modelling choices accepted by the reviewer. Each classification retains the evidence or recorded judgement supporting it
• Financial tests — checks statement reconciliations, roll-forwards, period alignment, debt balances and interest calculations against definitions and model blocks confirmed by the user
• Controlled recalculation — runs selected input shocks or proposed corrections on a separate copy, using a compatible calculation environment. The baseline, changed inputs and resulting outputs are retained
• Measured effects — compares recalculated outputs to the baseline and records financial differences. Each quantified effect is linked to the test performed and reported separately from static dependency findings
• Version comparison — structural and formula differences across versions; moved ranges, rewritten logic and candidate overrides identified. Changes to source data are distinguished from changes in the calculation logic
• Review register — records location, evidence, classification, priority, status and reviewer comments. Accepted exceptions carry a reason; resolved findings retain their correction and verification history
• Support declaration — identifies VBA, queries, external data, dynamic references and other constructs affecting coverage. Unsupported calculations and unexecuted tests are stated in the report
• Review record — maintains a versioned record of the inspected file, settings, test definitions and findings. Subsequent reviews identify new, unchanged and resolved items relative to the previous review

Architecture map. Interactive dependency graph. Prioritised findings register. Financial test results. Recalculation comparisons. Version comparison. Review report with coverage statement. Excel export.

Works independently on external and internally developed models. Reviews models adopted in MIES engagements and follows conventions shared with PROUVE. Examines valuation and planning models alongside TANGE and NERVI, with debt calculations cross-checked against BOOLE.

On request.

Confidential information extends beyond visible names. It also appears in comments, document properties, workbook structure and distinctive combinations of facts. ANDO inspects supported content locally, presents proposed substitutions for review and creates a version prepared for external processing. Entities retain consistent tokens across an engagement, while the mapping remains in the local environment. Returned text is recomposed against that mapping and checked for unresolved references. Project profiles retain approved rules so the same treatment applies to subsequent files.

Preparation of confidential material for external language-model workflows and local recomposition of returned content. Client and engagement profiles govern the treatment of entities, figures, dates and document content. Standalone use across professional domains.

Report drafting and review. Contract analysis. Due diligence. Data room summaries. Translation. Processing of client material under project-specific confidentiality rules. Consistent treatment across multiple documents and model providers.

• Pattern detection — applies defined patterns to identifiers, tax and company numbers, IBANs, contact details, addresses, URLs, dates and amounts within the supported document content
• Entity recognition — identifies references to people, organisations, brands, places and roles using a local model. Proposed matches are presented in context for acceptance, rejection or amendment
• Review — lists proposed substitutions and their occurrences. Users add missed terms, merge aliases, exclude references from substitution and approve the version prepared for external processing
• Consistent tokens — maintains one approved token per entity across files in the project. Token types preserve the roles and references needed to interpret the material
• Document layers — inspects metadata, comments, revisions and hidden content within each supported format. The coverage record identifies processed objects and content requiring separate review
• Numeric and date treatment — applies selected amount scaling and date shifting. Each transformation declares which totals, ratios, intervals or other relationships it preserves and which it changes
• Relationship checks — tests the relationships declared by the transformation profile. Deviations and unsupported checks are reported alongside the transformed material before it is approved
• Format integrity — retains supported formatting, tables, numbering and links. Workbook checks compare formula structure and references before and after substitution; unexplained changes require review
• Residual inspection — rescans the prepared version for remaining identifiers and flags distinctive combinations of facts. The reviewer can generalise, remove or retain the affected content
• Project profiles — stores client and project dictionaries, aliases, transformation rules and prohibited terms. Profiles provide consistent treatment across new documents and recurring assignments
• Model integration — routes the approved version to configured external models and receives the response. Identity mappings remain local across providers; occurrences of prohibited terms block transfer until addressed
• Local mapping — holds mappings in session memory or stores them locally under an explicit retention setting. Persisted mappings are encrypted and subject to defined deletion rules
• Recomposition — restores original references and reverses eligible numeric and date transformations locally. Unresolved tokens, altered references and values outside the declared reversal rules are listed for review
• Batch processing — processes document sets under a shared approved mapping, with file-level coverage, substitution and integrity results. Repeated entities remain consistent across the set
• Session record — records substitutions, review decisions, approved transfers, returned content and recomposition results. Logs remain available for the engagement file under the project retention rules
• Local processing — detection, substitution, residual inspection and recomposition run offline without transmitting source content or mappings. External transfer occurs through the separately configured model connection

Reviewed pseudonymised documents. Substitution register. Coverage and integrity results. Recomposed output with unresolved items. Project profile. Session log.

Prepares confidential material used with external models across MIES, PROUVE, TANGE, NERVI and AALTO workflows. LOOS supplies terminology and register controls for the prepared draft and recomposed report.

On request.

The language of a financial report draws distinctions between what was observed, represented, calculated and estimated. LOOS checks those distinctions across the document and revises terminology, syntax and register while preserving the author’s intended meaning. It works directly on Word drafts, returning tracked changes and a record of each proposed amendment. Bilingual review preserves professional equivalence between Italian and English. Comparison of executive summaries and analytical sections identifies differences in wording, definitions and certainty, with unresolved questions of interpretation referred to the professional for a decision.

Terminology, fluency, register, attribution and internal linguistic consistency in professional documents. Source verification, model validation and the formation of professional conclusions remain outside its scope.

Revision of valuation reports, due diligence reports, fairness opinions, business plans, independent business reviews, memoranda and board packs. Alignment of documents written by several authors. Italian-English translation and bilingual review. Definition and application of a house register.

• Domain lexicon — accounting, valuation, transactional and legal terms distinguished by context, including common terms that denote different technical concepts
• Register — formality, distance, first-person usage, active and passive voice and institutional phrasing aligned across sections while retaining the author’s voice
• Fluency — syntax, transitions, repetition, awkward constructions and translation artefacts revised while preserving the document’s approved structure and intended meaning
• Certainty and attribution — wording checked against the stated status of evidence: verified, represented, calculated, estimated or unverified; changes in attribution and degree of certainty flagged
• Professional formulations — findings, limitations, qualifications, recommendations and reliance language reviewed against document type, stated scope and usage conditions
• Word revision — targeted amendments returned as tracked changes in the supplied Word document, preserving the author’s voice; comments identify passages requiring clarification or a professional decision
• Amendment record — original wording, proposed wording, reason and applicable rule retained for each revision, with priority and document location
• Meaning preservation — figures, actors, dates, attribution, qualifications, limitations and analytical meaning preserved during rewriting; ambiguities and discrepancies flagged for review
• Bilingual equivalence — Italian and English terminology, register and certainty aligned; terms and formulations without direct professional equivalents are identified and explained
• Document consistency — definitions, abbreviations, terminology and verbal descriptions compared across sections; inconsistent references and contradictory wording identified
• Summary review — executive-summary statements compared with analytical sections for changes in meaning, scope, qualification or certainty; relevant passages shown together
• Evidence limits — statements without identifiable support in the supplied material flagged for assessment; evidence gaps recorded as unresolved
• Retrieval — semantic search returns contextual formulations, methodological disclosures, transitions and closing language with their conditions of use
• House conventions — firm terminology, preferred formulations and prohibitions applied with precedence over the base register; exceptions remain visible
• Model context — retrieved terminology and structural rules guide drafting and revision
• Provenance and review record — entries retain documentary origin and usage conditions; accepted amendments, dismissed findings and unresolved questions remain available for review

Word document with tracked changes and comments. Amendment register. Prioritised validation report. Retrieved formulations. Bilingual term lists. House register.

Works independently on supplied documents and within MIES and PROUVE workflows. Reviews language in TANGE valuation reports, NERVI plan narratives and other suite deliverables. ANDO prepares confidential material for external document processing.

On request.